Home > Indian History > History of India > Amending Act of 1781
Amending Act of 1781
Amending act of 1781 was formulated in a hurry, to repair the terrible blunders committed by the Supreme Court.

Share this Article:

Amending Act of 1781, British IndiaWarren Hastings, the first governor-general of Bengal was in the midst of huge dishonour and arguments as he committed a crime while in term of office. That hideous crime was a terrible wrong imposed on a native resident, by the name of Nandkumar, an Indian tax official. Hastings teamed with his trusted band of ministers who were all members of the Supreme Court of India, accused Nandkumar to trial on the charge of forgery as provided for within the English law of forgery. Finally Nandakumar was hanged.

In consequence of this much-criticised case of Nandkumar, British law both in India and England sat up to take attention in the holes committed by lawmakers sitting in Indian governance. British rule was being shunned in every corner of India, making the English rulers think of a fresh path to justice. The Amending Act of 1781 was that fresh path, which was looked after carefully and formulated quite solemnly. The shame to top the whole incident was that the Supreme Court was in question of forgery and judicial callousness.

On 1st February 1781, the House of Commons heard three petitions criticising the conduct of the Supreme Court of Calcutta. The petitions emanated from the Governor and Council of Bengal, from the British East India Company and one signed by 648 British subjects living in Bengal. The petitions were referred to a Select Committee of the Commons, known as the Touchet Committee.

On 15th February, the Touchet Committee began its examination of the justice system in Bengal.

On 5th July 1781, Parliament passed the Amending Act to the Regulating Act of 1773, which significantly reduced the powers of the Supreme Court at Calcutta. It separated the Governor-General-in-Council and revenue matters from the Court`s jurisdiction. The act`s geographic jurisdiction became limited to only Calcutta. The Act recognised the appellate jurisdiction of the Governor-General-in-Council. It empowered the Governor-General and Council to convene as a Court of Record to hear appeals from the Provincial Courts on civil cases. Likewise, as a Court of Record it held the power to formulate regulations for the operations of the Provincial Courts. The Act also asserted that Mohammedan cases should be determined by Mohammedan law and Hindu law applied in Hindu cases.

On the same date in the same year, the Bengal Government passed into law a compilation of ninety-five articles prepared by Sir Elijah Impey (1732-1809), amending and consolidating pre-existing rules of civil procedure. The regulation appeared in English, Persian and Bengali languages. This code set a precedent for future consolidations of law over the next few decades until 1834 and the appearance of the first Bengal code.

On 29th June 1782, Hastings issued a proclamation which ostensibly made all zamindars, chowdris, taluqdars and other property owners in the `Mofussil` (places and areas that did not fall under city categories, remote districts) responsible for preventing crime and for bringing to justice those who did commit crimes. This measure was fleetingly honoured in spirit, but proved impossible to execute. Yet, Amending Act of 1781 had tried to recover much of the `native` blunders committed, owing to the keenest attention paid by English lawmakers after their stupidity in the Nandkumar case.

On 29th October 1782, Impey received from Lord Shelburne (1737-1805) a letter of recall from his position of Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Calcutta. Politics aside, the recall regarded Impey`s acceptance of the position on the Sadar Diwani Adalat. In addition, Impey also had to hold the position of Chief Justice of the Bengal Supreme Court, as possessing the implications of a conflict in interests.

In 1786, an Act of Parliament made British subjects in India subject to the Courts of Oyer and Terminer and Gaol Delivery for all criminal offences.

In 1787, Lord Charles Cornwallis (1738-1805) revised the civil court system to reunite in the provinces criminal justice and revenue issues under the superintendence of the Collector, but in separate courts. Having gained some experience, in 1793 he changed his mind and again separated judicial from revenue adjudication.


Share this Article:

Related Articles

More Articles in History of India


History of Uttar Pradesh
The state was the heart of Mahabharata war and the history of Uttar Pradesh is very much the history of India. The place finds its mentions in Hindu epics Ramayana and Mahabharata.
History Of Archaeology In India
History of archaeology in India contributes a lot to define the past history and the social life of India.
Mughal Architecture during Babur
Mughal Architecture during Babur is of adequate significance in Mughal history, as the emperor introduced Mughal architecture in India, during 16th century.
Princely State of Patdi
Princely State of Patdi or Patri was incorporated as a part of the Baroda Agency, which was a sub division of Western India States Agency.
Architecture during Sayyid and Lodi Dynasty
Architectures during the Sayyid and Lodi dynasty were mainly the tombs and monuments for the dead rulers. It were carefully designed and meticulously constructed.
Brahmanical Sources of Ancient History
Brahmanical Sources of ancient history are contained in the Vedas and they constitute one of the most important literary sources of information about ancient India.
Female Education In British India
The over brimming enthusiasm among zealous Hindu reformers welcomed female education in British India.
Revenue System of Mauryan Empire
Revenue system of Mauryan Empire can be divided into eight categories. The principal revenue of the state was the land revenue, taxes from traders, artisans and professional taxes were also collected.
Mughal Architecture During Jahangir
Mughal architecture during Jahangir`s period was relative dull in comparison to that of Akbar dynasty.
Princely State of Satlasna
Princely State of Satlasna was amongst the former native states of India that was appointed as one of the Indian princely states during the early 19th century.
Coins of Chola Empire
Coins of Chola Empire were issued in gold, silver and copper and carried the Chola emblem.
Social Life during the Pala Period
Religious toleration and simple living were the characteristics of social life during the Pala period.
Coins of the Chalukya Dynasty
Coins of the Chalukya Dynasty was reintroduced in the South India after a brief break of coinage less period of nearly three century. Chalukyas issued coins only in gold and they exhibit a brilliant artistic skill of the engraver.
Costumes of Indus Valley Civilisation
Costumes of Indus valley Civilization have been considered as the basis for Indian clothes. Sophisticated ornaments and make up were used during that age.
Development of Science under Gupta Empire
Development of Science under Gupta Empire was progressive and it had attained considerable perfection. Mathematics, astronomy, medicine, chemistry, physics and metallurgy were the most prominent of the sciences at that time.
Culture under Delhi Sultanate
Culture under Delhi Sultanate had enduring aspects to it. It included the society, the religious condition, literature and art and architecture of that period.
Princely State of Hapa
Princely State of Hapa was incorporated as a part of the Baroda Agency, which was under the administrative control of the Western India States Agency.
Economy Under Chola Dynasty
Economy under Chola dynasty was strong and well developed. The economic life of the people of the Chola Kingdom was well balanced with their social life.
Coins of Khilji Dynasty
Coins of Khilji Dynasty had an influential feature that was followed by the other dynasties.
Religion During Mauryan Dynasty
Religion during Mauryan dynasty became a considerable episode in Indian history with an esteemed lineage of rulers.