Home > Indian History > History of India > Acceptance of Mountbatten Plan
Acceptance of Mountbatten Plan
Acceptance of Mountbatten Plan by the Indian leaders resulted in the Partition of India .

Share this Article:

JinnahThe decision of accepting the Mountbatten Plan by the Indian leaders brought about a major change in the country. During that period, the country witnessed various diverse views among the leaders regarding the acceptance of the plan. The Congress and the Muslim League expressed opposed views. In addition to this Mohammed Ali Jinnah demanded for passage to link West and East Pakistan. However, all the Congress leaders strongly opposed Jinnah`s demand. Nehru posed serious doubts on Jinnah`s intention, if at all he desired any settlement for the problem. The Viceroy, Lord Mountbatten, took up the matter and dealt with it personally.

Apart from this problem, another issue created a stir in the political situation during the absence Lord Mountbatten. Gandhiji was in favour of a United India and desired that Cabinet Mission plan should be imposed by force. But Sir John Colville, the acting Viceroy, met Lord Mountbatten in this regard and failed to assure him of Gandhiji`s true intention and his request. On the other hand, Congress leaders, Nehru and Patel, requested Lord Mountbatten to invite B. Kripalani, the Congress President who held an equivalent post to Jinnah, to meet the Viceroy. But Lord Mountbatten invited Jinnah along with one or more League representatives to offer fairness. Consequently, on 2nd June the historic conference was held and it was attended by the seven leaders - Nehru, Patel and Kripalani on behalf of the Congress; Jinnah, Liaqat Ali Khan and Abdur Rab Nishtar on behalf of the League while Baldev Singh represented the Sikhs.

At the conference, Lord Mountbatten expressed his view on the political unrest in the country. He referred to groups who wanted an end to the present state of political uncertainty. He even desired to transfer powers as soon as possible. The viceroy also explained the uncertainty of the Cabinet Mission plan. He had reported to His Majesty`s Government that Jinnah and the Muslim League were unable to withdraw their rejection of the plan. According to the Viceroy he had met different parties and the plan was accepted by all. However, there were underlying differences between the two major parties. The Congress would not agree to the principle of the partition of India while Jinnah, who demanded the partition of India, would not agree to the principle of the partition of provinces. Lord Mountbatten during his visit to London discussed both the Cabinet Mission plan and the issue of partition. In addition to that, the Viceroy expressed his views about the troubled position of the Sikhs. He had repeatedly asked the Sikh leaders whether they desired the partition of Punjab. Although this decision of partition would divide the whole Sikh community yet they opted for partition. However the partition did not solve the purpose as no solution had been found to safeguard the interests of the Sikhs.

Mountbatten On the other hand, regarding the immediate transfer of power, the Indian leaders decided that this should take place soon after partition. Accordingly, the Viceroy requested His Majesty`s Government that the necessary legislation should be done depending on the present parliamentary session of the country. The Viceroy stated that power would be transferred on the basis of Dominion Status. Thus, the new Indian Government would be free to withdraw from the Commonwealth whenever they wished to.

The Congress accepted the Mountbatten plan, though did not give their complete. But the acceptance of the plan by the Muslim League came much later. The Congress Working Committee met on 2nd June to decide to accept the plan. Kripalani stated that the acceptance of the Mountbatten plan would be a settlement. He hoped that the situation in India and the problems arising, political and economic, as well as communal would be solved. On behalf of the Sikhs, Baldev Singh accepted the principle of partition as laid down in the plan. Jinnah put forth that he would try to make the plan accepted by his Working Committee. The Viceroy, thus, communicated to the Secretary of State the depending on the assurances given by Nehru, Jinnah and Baldev Singh regarding the acceptance of the Mountbatten plan. As a result, Attlee announced the plan in the House of Commons on 3rd June. Finally the plan came to be known as `the June 3rd Plan`. Soon after, the Prime Minister put forth, that as the Indian leaders have failed to agree on the Cabinet Mission`s plan for a united India, partition becomes the expected solution. According to him, there were twofold purpose of the plan; firstly, it was to make possible the maximum degree of co-operation and harmony between the political parties. Secondly, it would enable the British Government to hand over their responsibilities in an orderly and constitutional manner. The plan, thus, provided for the handing over of power that year to one or two governments, each having Dominion Status.

However, the proposed plan had its opponents as well. The Working Committee of the Hindu Mahasabha passed a resolution and pointed out that India is an indivisible country and there will never be peace unless and until the separated areas are brought back into the Indian Union and made integral parts thereof. The Mahasabha called for an `Anti-Pakistan Day`. Thus, after several changeable opinions there was the acceptance of the plan by all the main political parties of the country.

The primary reason behind Congress` acceptance of the Mountbatten was to end the communal fury between the Congress and the Muslim League leaders. The Congress leaders decided by June, 1947 that only an immediate transfer of power could prevent the spread of direct action and communal disturbances. According to Sardar Patel a partitioned India was better than a disorganised and troubled India. The Congress leaders were of the view that Muslim League was only concerned with their own interests. They were not concerned about the future of country. Moreover, they would act as an obstacle in the path of India`s progress. Furthermore, the Congress leaders also felt that the continuance of British rule could never serve the interest of Indians.


Share this Article:

Related Articles

More Articles in History of India


History of Uttar Pradesh
The state was the heart of Mahabharata war and the history of Uttar Pradesh is very much the history of India. The place finds its mentions in Hindu epics Ramayana and Mahabharata.
History Of Archaeology In India
History of archaeology in India contributes a lot to define the past history and the social life of India.
Mughal Architecture during Babur
Mughal Architecture during Babur is of adequate significance in Mughal history, as the emperor introduced Mughal architecture in India, during 16th century.
Princely State of Patdi
Princely State of Patdi or Patri was incorporated as a part of the Baroda Agency, which was a sub division of Western India States Agency.
Architecture during Sayyid and Lodi Dynasty
Architectures during the Sayyid and Lodi dynasty were mainly the tombs and monuments for the dead rulers. It were carefully designed and meticulously constructed.
Brahmanical Sources of Ancient History
Brahmanical Sources of ancient history are contained in the Vedas and they constitute one of the most important literary sources of information about ancient India.
Female Education In British India
The over brimming enthusiasm among zealous Hindu reformers welcomed female education in British India.
Revenue System of Mauryan Empire
Revenue system of Mauryan Empire can be divided into eight categories. The principal revenue of the state was the land revenue, taxes from traders, artisans and professional taxes were also collected.
Mughal Architecture During Jahangir
Mughal architecture during Jahangir`s period was relative dull in comparison to that of Akbar dynasty.
Princely State of Satlasna
Princely State of Satlasna was amongst the former native states of India that was appointed as one of the Indian princely states during the early 19th century.
Coins of Chola Empire
Coins of Chola Empire were issued in gold, silver and copper and carried the Chola emblem.
Social Life during the Pala Period
Religious toleration and simple living were the characteristics of social life during the Pala period.
Coins of the Chalukya Dynasty
Coins of the Chalukya Dynasty was reintroduced in the South India after a brief break of coinage less period of nearly three century. Chalukyas issued coins only in gold and they exhibit a brilliant artistic skill of the engraver.
Costumes of Indus Valley Civilisation
Costumes of Indus valley Civilization have been considered as the basis for Indian clothes. Sophisticated ornaments and make up were used during that age.
Development of Science under Gupta Empire
Development of Science under Gupta Empire was progressive and it had attained considerable perfection. Mathematics, astronomy, medicine, chemistry, physics and metallurgy were the most prominent of the sciences at that time.
Culture under Delhi Sultanate
Culture under Delhi Sultanate had enduring aspects to it. It included the society, the religious condition, literature and art and architecture of that period.
Princely State of Hapa
Princely State of Hapa was incorporated as a part of the Baroda Agency, which was under the administrative control of the Western India States Agency.
Economy Under Chola Dynasty
Economy under Chola dynasty was strong and well developed. The economic life of the people of the Chola Kingdom was well balanced with their social life.
Coins of Khilji Dynasty
Coins of Khilji Dynasty had an influential feature that was followed by the other dynasties.
Religion During Mauryan Dynasty
Religion during Mauryan dynasty became a considerable episode in Indian history with an esteemed lineage of rulers.