Home > Indian History > History of India > Government of India Act
Government of India Act
The Government of India act was the longest piece of legislation ever passed by the British parliament.

Share this Article:

Congress president Rajendra Prasad The Government of India act was the longest piece of legislation ever passed by the British parliament. It was intended to be the basis of an enduring Anglo-Indian raj. But in the event only part of it was put into effect, and that part lasted only two years. The act is of considerable significance. The first significance can be mentioned as because it provided the groundwork for the negotiations that led to the final transfer of power into Indian bands. Secondly, even though the act was conceived as a means of perpetuating British rule, some of its provisions were well drawn up. In later days they were found suitable for inclusion in the constitution of independent India.

The Government of India act provided for a federation that would include not only the various provinces of British India but also the princely states. A very elaborate division of power was envisaged. Some subjects would be federal i.e. central, others provincial, and still others were `concurrent`. Diarchy was introduced at the centre. This meant that certain `reserved` subjects i.e. defense, external affairs, etc. were to be administered exclusively by the governor general. Up to three appointed counselors were under the custody of governor general.

In the other federal subjects the governor general would be advised by his council of ministers. But even here he kept certain `special responsibilities`. It is clear that under the new act there would be no responsible government at the centre. India was not yet ready for this, the British claimed. The people of the country had heard this many times before. However the point had been reached when the old lame excuses would no longer be accepted.

The proposed central government was to be completed by a bicameral i.e. two-chamber legislature, and a federal court. Representation in both chambers of the legislature was to be weighted in favour of the princely states. The British government looked on the princes as its natural allies, and it strengthened their position in the hope that they would slow down the inevitable movement towards independence. Despite this special treatment, the princes refused to join the federation. As a result, the entire system outlined above was never implemented. However federation would remain a vital question in the years to come.

Of more immediate significance than the federal part of the act of 1935 were the provisions relating to the provinces. Indeed, the most important feature of the entire act was provincial autonomy. This meant that provincial governments exercised complete control over the subjects allotted to them. Diarchy in the provinces, which was the unsuccessful innovation of the act of 1919, was abolished. In every subject governors has to act on the advice of their ministers, who thus had effective control over the provincial administration. The governors appointed ministers, but were responsible to popularly elected legislative assemblies. Therefore could truly be considered the people`s representatives as well.

Madan Mohan Malaviya It would seem that the British had finally surrendered some real power to the people of India. But they were careful to hedge this power around with safeguards. According to the new act, governors kept certain `discretionary powers` and `special responsibilities`. As for example they could dismiss ministers at their discretion. These undemocratic powers became a bone of contention between the British government and the congress after the first provincial elections under the act.

In India the act of 1935 could please very few persons. The princes rejected it because it would have meant the surrender of some of their autocratic powers. But from the point of view of the people of British India these relics of the feudal age had been allotted too much power. Princes would have been able to interfere in the affairs of the provinces, but the people in the provinces would have had no say at all in the affairs of the states. As for the people of the states, they were given no representation whatsoever. Congress president Rajendra Prasad commented in regard to these proposals as `It will be a kind of federation in which unabashed autocracy will sit entrenched in one-third of India and peep in now and then to strangle popular will in the remaining two-thirds.`

Diarchy, which had proved a failure in the provinces, was now going to be tried at the centre. The experience was worse. Representatives of parties other than congress were also disappointed in the act of 1935. The liberal C. Y. Chintamani considered the basis of the act as `a cruel denial of the most cherished aspirations of the people of this country`. The moderate leader Madan Mohan Malaviya said that the statute has a somewhat democratic appearance outwardly, but it is absolutely hollow from inside. Jinnah bluntly called it `thoroughly rotten, fundamentally bad, and totally unacceptable`.

Even many Englishmen could see through the new legislation. During the parliamentary debate, labour leader Clement Attlee summed up his viewpoint by saying that `the keynote of the bill is mistrust`. An English historian has argued that the entire act was a device for safeguarding British financial interests in India. This opinion is given support by a private letter of lord Linlithgow. Later he became the viceroy. He had much to do with the enforcement of the act that he helped to create. Linlithgow wrote that the act of 1935 took the form that it did, "Because we thought that way the best way. Of maintaining British influence in India. It is no part of our policy, I take it... To hurry the handing over of the controls to Indian hands at any pace faster than that which we regard as best calculated, on a long view, to hold India to the empire."

But whatever its limitations, the act of 1935 marked a decisive turning point in India`s constitutional history. Parliamentary institutions, even if in a weakened form, were the framework of the new governmental set-up. The strong element of Indian representation made it certain that these institutions would gradually become stronger. This meant eventual independence, perhaps within a generation.


Share this Article:

Related Articles

More Articles in History of India


History of Uttar Pradesh
The state was the heart of Mahabharata war and the history of Uttar Pradesh is very much the history of India. The place finds its mentions in Hindu epics Ramayana and Mahabharata.
History Of Archaeology In India
History of archaeology in India contributes a lot to define the past history and the social life of India.
Mughal Architecture during Babur
Mughal Architecture during Babur is of adequate significance in Mughal history, as the emperor introduced Mughal architecture in India, during 16th century.
Princely State of Patdi
Princely State of Patdi or Patri was incorporated as a part of the Baroda Agency, which was a sub division of Western India States Agency.
Architecture during Sayyid and Lodi Dynasty
Architectures during the Sayyid and Lodi dynasty were mainly the tombs and monuments for the dead rulers. It were carefully designed and meticulously constructed.
Brahmanical Sources of Ancient History
Brahmanical Sources of ancient history are contained in the Vedas and they constitute one of the most important literary sources of information about ancient India.
Female Education In British India
The over brimming enthusiasm among zealous Hindu reformers welcomed female education in British India.
Revenue System of Mauryan Empire
Revenue system of Mauryan Empire can be divided into eight categories. The principal revenue of the state was the land revenue, taxes from traders, artisans and professional taxes were also collected.
Mughal Architecture During Jahangir
Mughal architecture during Jahangir`s period was relative dull in comparison to that of Akbar dynasty.
Princely State of Satlasna
Princely State of Satlasna was amongst the former native states of India that was appointed as one of the Indian princely states during the early 19th century.
Coins of Chola Empire
Coins of Chola Empire were issued in gold, silver and copper and carried the Chola emblem.
Social Life during the Pala Period
Religious toleration and simple living were the characteristics of social life during the Pala period.
Coins of the Chalukya Dynasty
Coins of the Chalukya Dynasty was reintroduced in the South India after a brief break of coinage less period of nearly three century. Chalukyas issued coins only in gold and they exhibit a brilliant artistic skill of the engraver.
Costumes of Indus Valley Civilisation
Costumes of Indus valley Civilization have been considered as the basis for Indian clothes. Sophisticated ornaments and make up were used during that age.
Development of Science under Gupta Empire
Development of Science under Gupta Empire was progressive and it had attained considerable perfection. Mathematics, astronomy, medicine, chemistry, physics and metallurgy were the most prominent of the sciences at that time.
Culture under Delhi Sultanate
Culture under Delhi Sultanate had enduring aspects to it. It included the society, the religious condition, literature and art and architecture of that period.
Princely State of Hapa
Princely State of Hapa was incorporated as a part of the Baroda Agency, which was under the administrative control of the Western India States Agency.
Economy Under Chola Dynasty
Economy under Chola dynasty was strong and well developed. The economic life of the people of the Chola Kingdom was well balanced with their social life.
Coins of Khilji Dynasty
Coins of Khilji Dynasty had an influential feature that was followed by the other dynasties.
Religion During Mauryan Dynasty
Religion during Mauryan dynasty became a considerable episode in Indian history with an esteemed lineage of rulers.