Dyarchy in India - Informative & researched article on Dyarchy in India
 Indianetzone: Largest Free Encyclopedia of India with thousand of articlesHistory of India

 Art & Culture|Entertainment|Health|Reference|Sports|Society|Travel
Forum  | Free E-magazine  | RSS Feeds  
History of India|Indian Temples|Indian Museums|Indian Literature|Geography of India|Flora & Fauna|Indian Purans|Indian Philosophy|Indian Administration|Indian Languages|Education
Home > Reference > History of India > Modern History of India > British Empire in India > Administration of British Empire > Dyarchy in India
Dyarchy in India
It means the government was unsuccessful and due to which local administration grew stronger and even manipulative.
 Dyarchy in IndiaWith the arriving into power of the Government of India Act 1919, local self-government became a 'transferred' field under democratic ministerial control. Government of India no longer brought out any direction for regional governments and each province was permitted to grow local self-institutions, according to provincial demands and necessities. Under the Scheduled Taxes Rules, the taxes which could be imposed by local bodies were divided from those which fell inside the capability of regional governments. The Indian ministers could not do much work in the field of local self-government, due to deficiency of funds, since finance was a 'reserved' issue under the jurisdiction of an Executive Councilor.

In May 1930, the Simon Commission cited the massive financial powers implemented by local bodies. It observed that the village panchayats had not depicted any noticeable progress in U.P. Bengal and Madras. The commission proposed the retrograde step of elevating the command of provincial governments over local bodies in the sake of keener skilfulness and quoted the example of England "by numerous administrative devices, by inspection, by audit, by giving of grants-in-aid on conditions ensuring efficiency and by insisting on standards of competence in the municipal staff, the local Government Board and its successors, the ministry of Health have steadily raised the standard of administration in local authorities". Commenting on the deprived financial condition of local organisations, the Commission negatively remarked on the unwillingness of the elected members to enforce taxes and stated that the management of finances of local organisations had degenerated after the introduction of the Reforms of 1919 and the sloppiness could not be effectively corrected by insufficient powers of audit, owned by regional governments.

(Last Updated on : 16/04/2012)
E-mail this Article | Post a Comment
More Articles in Administration of British Empire  (32)
Recently Updated Articles in History of India
Tirumala Deva Raya
Tirumala Deva Raya was the brother of the Aliya Rama Raya and son-in-law of Krishna Deva Raya.
Sriranga II
Sriranga II was killed within four months of his accession, but one of his sons, Rama Deva, escaped.
Sriranga Deva Raya I
Sriranga I died in 1586, without an heir and was succeeded by his youngest brother Venkatapathi Raya (Venkata II).
Ruler of Aravidu Dynasty
Rama Raya was a successful army general, able administerator and tactful diplomat of Aravidu Dynasty.
Forum on History of India
Free E-magazine
Subscribe to Free E-Magazine on Reference
Dyarchy in India - Informative & researched article on Dyarchy in India
Contact Us   |   RSS Feeds
Copyright © 2008 Jupiter Infomedia Ltd. All rights reserved including the right to reproduce the contents in whole or in part in any form or medium without the express written permission of
Jupiter Infomedia Ltd.