Hunter Committee, 1919-1920, British India - Informative & researched article on Hunter Committee, 1919-1920, British India
  Indianetzone: Largest Free Encyclopedia of India with thousand of articles History of India

Art & Culture | Entertainment | Health | Reference | Sports | Society | Travel
Forum  | RSS Feeds  | Free E-magazine
History of India : Sources of History of India l Ancient History of India l Medieval History of India l Modern History Of India l Indian Historical Dynasties l Indian Battles l Indian Rulers l History of India l Indian Freedom Struggle l Indian Governor- Generals l British Indian Acts l Post Independence India
Home > Reference > History of India > Modern History Of India > British Empire in India > Administration of British Empire > Hunter Committee
Hunter Committee, 1919-1920, British India
The Hunter Committee led the case of Jalianwalabagh tragedy with sensitivity, balancing both sides.

On 29th October 1919, the Legislative Council of the Government of India named an investigatory committee to be led by Lord William Hunter (1865-1957) and assisted by five Englishmen and four Indians. This was named as the Hunter Committee. The Hunter Committee was charged with the examination of the violence which had occurred in Amritsar and elsewhere in Punjab, in consequence of the catastrophic Jalianwalabagh Amritsar massacre. In November, the Hunter Committee convened in Delhi and then took further testimony in Ahmedabad, Bombay and Lahore over a period of forty-six days.

The Hunter Committee`s majority reprimanded Brigadier-General Dyer in its final report for his mistaken concept of duty On 14th November, the Indian National Congress appointed a Punjab subcommittee with Mahatma Gandhi at its head. He was to conduct his own investigation of events in Punjab and at Amritsar in April 1919. As a counter measure to the Hunter Committee, its work also possessed some shortcomings.

On 19th November, Brigadier-General Reginald Dyer appeared before the Hunter Committee to produce evidence. He testified that he had planned to fire in advance of arrival at the gardens and not only for the purpose of dispersing the crowd, but to produce a moral impact in order to prevent the spread of mutiny. He indicated that if possible he would have used machine guns and armoured cars. Finally, he acknowledged that he had left the wounded unattended. On 8th March 1920, the Hunter Committee`s majority reprimanded Brigadier-General Dyer in its final report for his mistaken concept of duty. Likewise, several other civil and military officials of Punjab received censor or early retirement.

On 26th May, the Hunter Report was published. It concluded that the Indian gathering was not the result of a pre-arranged conspiracy. It asserted that the rioting in Amritsar had turned into rebellion. The declaration of martial law was viewed as justifiable and that its application was, in the main, not oppressive. The report concluded that Brigadier-General Dyer was justified in firing on the mob, though notice should have been given and its duration shortened. The Indian members of the Hunter Committee issued a minority report. It questioned the need for martial law to have been used and disputed the level of severity of the Indian disturbances.

After the Hunter Committee completed its work, the Government of India provided 15,000 rupees for dependents of those killed at Jalianwala Bagh living in Amritsar and with 12,000 rupees for those killed living in outlying villages.

On 8th July, the House of Commons debated the Dyer issue. It supported the decision of the Army Council that no further employment should be offered to Brigadier-General Dyer. The House of Lords concorded to this decision in the course of debates on July 19 and 20, 1920.

In the same year, in London, The Morning Post raised a public fund of 26,000 pounds for Brigadier-General Dyer calling him "The Saviour of India". One-third of the total was collected from contributors located in India.

  More Articles in Administration of British Empire
Medical Conditions during 19th Century Scientific Associations in British India History of Establishment of Cotton Industry in India
History of Beginning of Tea Industry in India British Land Revenue System in India Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms
Butler Committee Hunter Committee Welby Commission
Indian Factory Legislation Public Services Commission Indian Financial Reform
Policy of Equal Federation Policy of subordinate Union Dyarchy in India
Subsidiary Alliance System The Decentralisation Commission Report, 1908 The Resolution of May 1918
Morley-Minto Reforms Act Growth of Constitution under the Company`s Rule Growth of Representative Government in India
Delhi Durbar of December 1911 Administration of Punjab Imperial Service Troops
Batta Crisis Military Administration in British India British Administration During Second World War
British Policy in India    
(Last Updated on : 9/04/2009)
Recently Updated Articles in History of India
  • Ashokan Dhamma
    Ashokan Dhamma was the most discussed religious policy ever adopted by King Ashoka. Ashokan Dhamma disseminated teachings and knowledge of the Buddhist scriptures.
  • Battle of Plassey
    Battle of Plassey was fought between Siraj Ud Daulah and Lord Clive that marked the establishment of British East India Company.
  • Viceroys of India
    Viceroys of India played a vital part in influencing the future of India and the Indian people. Several Viceroys have taken the office until Indian independence.
  • Third Battle of Panipat
    Third Battle of Panipat took place between the Afghans and the Marathas in which Marathas were defeated.
    E-mail this Article | Post a Comment
    Forum on History of India

    Free E-magazine
    Subscribe to Free
    E-Magazine on Indian Crafts
    Hunter Committee, 1919-1920, British India - Informative & researched article on Hunter Committee, 1919-1920, British India
    Contact Us   |   RSS Feeds
    Copyright © 2008 Jupiter Infomedia Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved including the right to reproduce the contents in whole or in part in any form or medium without the express written permission of Jupiter Infomedia Pvt. Ltd.